- Axiom insider trading allegations center on the misuse of internal dashboard tools to track private wallets.
- Recordings and screenshots suggest employees accessed sensitive user data without strict oversight.
- Investigation findings were shared publicly, with potential jurisdiction in New York.
Allegations have emerged following claims that Axiom platform employees misused internal tools to monitor private wallets. An independent investigation exposed detailed recordings, screenshots, and wallet activity tied to alleged misconduct within the trading platform.
Allegations Surface Through Public Thread
Axiom insider trading allegations became public after blockchain investigator ZachXBT published a detailed thread on X. The posts named Broox Bauer, known online as WheresBroox, are a central figure in the claims.
ZachXBT stated that Bauer, a senior business development employee based in New York, accessed sensitive user information. According to the thread, Bauer allegedly used internal dashboard tools to track wallet activity for trading advantage.
The investigator said he was retained to examine misconduct reports at Axiom. The platform, founded in 2024 by Mist and Cal, reportedly generated more than $390 million in revenue after joining Y Combinator’s Winter 2025 batch.
Recordings from February 2026 were referenced in the thread. In those clips, Bauer allegedly described tracking users through referral codes, wallet addresses, or unique identifiers.
He also outlined gradual wallet monitoring strategies to avoid suspicion. Screenshots show private wallet details for traders identified as Jerry and Monix.
Additional posts referenced discussions involving meme coin traders connected to the token AURA.
ZachXBT reported that multiple key opinion leaders named in leaked materials confirmed wallet data accuracy. The tweets did not include a response from the accused employees at publication time.
Internal Dashboard Access and Data Exposure
The Axiom insider trading allegations focus heavily on internal dashboard permissions. According to the thread, the dashboard granted access to full wallet lists, timestamps, tracked wallets, and linked accounts.
Such access reportedly extended beyond what is typical for business development roles. The investigation stated there was limited monitoring or access control over these tools.
In one recording, Bauer allegedly set ground rules for lookup requests. He also stated he would share compiled wallet lists with associates.
The thread described a private group call where members discussed strategy. A Google Sheet reportedly compiled wallet addresses of targeted traders.
The data was said to originate from the internal Axiom dashboard. Several individuals contacted confirmed the wallet associations were accurate.
One trader named Marcell was described as a target due to meme coin bundling practices. The thread explained that private wallets are rarely public, increasing their trading value.
The investigator suggested the absence of oversight allowed sensitive user information to circulate. The company’s founders were contacted for comment, and a statement was attached to the thread.
Wallet Activity and Potential Jurisdiction
The Axiom insider trading allegations also referenced specific wallet addresses tied to Bauer. One main wallet was identified through private chat messages.
Related addresses were mapped to trace transaction flows. Due to high meme coin trading volume, the thread noted difficulty isolating definitive insider trades.
However, several centralized exchange deposit addresses were listed as destinations for funds. The posts also mentioned other Axiom employees.
Bauer allegedly claimed another business development employee conducted user lookups. A recently hired moderator and an associate were also referenced in recordings.
In the February 2026 call, Bauer allegedly described a plan to generate $200,000 in profits by exploiting access. Screenshots of exchange balances were reportedly shared in private chats.
The investigator noted Bauer’s New York location could place the matter within the Southern District of New York’s jurisdiction. Whether charges will follow remains uncertain.
Axiom insider trading allegations now place the firm under scrutiny regarding internal compliance practices. The company’s response and any regulatory developments are expected to determine the next steps.